On Absoluteness of Categoricity in Abstract Elementary Classes

نویسندگان

  • Sy-David Friedman
  • Martin Koerwien
چکیده

Shelah has shown in [4] that א1-categoricity for Abstract Elementary Classes (AEC’s) is not absolute in the following sense: There is an example K of an AEC (which is actually axiomatizable in the logic L(Q)) such that if 2א0 < 2א1 (the weak CH holds) then K has the maximum possible number of models of size א1, whereas if Martin’s Axiom at א1 (denoted by MAא1) holds then K is א1-categorical. In this note we extract the properties from Shelah’s example which make both parts work resulting in our definitions of condition A and condition B, and then we show that for any AEC satisfying these two conditions, neither of these implications can be reversed. 1. The model theoretic context In Shelah’s paper [4], the notion of Abstract Elementary Classes (AEC) was introduced, the idea being to write down basic properties of the first order elementary substructure relation. Definition 1. Let K be a class of models of a given similarity type and let ≺ be a partial ordering on K refining the ordinary substructure relation. The pair K = (K,≺) is an AEC, if (1) both K and ≺ are closed under isomorphism. (2) A ≺ C, B ≺ C and A ⊂ B imply A ≺ B (3) for any continuous ≺-chain (Aα)α<λ, (a) A = ⋃ α<λ Aα ∈ K (b) for all α < λ, Aα ≺ A (c) if Aα ≺ B for some B and all α < λ, then A ≺ B 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 03C35, 03C52, 03E35.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Amalgamation, Absoluteness, and Categoricity

We describe the major result on categoricity in Lω1,ω , placing it in the context of more general work in abstract elementary classes. In particular, we illustrate the role of higher dimensional amalgamations and sketch the role of a weak extension of ZFC in the proof. We expound the translation of the problem to studying atomic models of first order theories. We provide a simple example of the...

متن کامل

Abstract Elementary Classes Motivations and Directions

Elementary Classes Motivations and Directions John T. Baldwin Why AEC? Categoricity and Complex Exponentiation Excellence– Generalized Amalgamation Eventual Categoricity Core Mathematics again Abstract Elementary Classes Motivations and Directions

متن کامل

Categoricity and Stability in Abstract Elementary Classes

Categoricity and Stability in Abstract Elementary Classes byMonica M. VanDieren This thesis tackles the classification theory of non-elementary classes from twoperspectives. In Chapter II we work towards a categoricity transfer theorem, whileChapter III focuses on the development of a stability theory for abstract elementaryclasses (AECs).The results in Chapter II are in a c...

متن کامل

Shelah's categoricity conjecture from a successor for tame abstract elementary classes

We prove a categoricity transfer theorem for tame abstract elementary classes. Theorem 0.1. Suppose that K is a χ-tame abstract elementary class and satisfies the amalgamation and joint embedding properties and has arbitrarily large models. Let λ ≥ Max{χ,LS(K)}. If K is categorical in λ and λ, then K is categorical in λ. Combining this theorem with some results from [Sh 394], we derive a form o...

متن کامل

Categoricity in Abstract Elementary Classes with No Maximal Models

The results in this paper are in a context of abstract elementary classes identified by Shelah and Villaveces in which the amalgamation property is not assumed. The long-term goal is to solve Shelah’s Categoricity Conjecture in this context. Here we tackle a problem of Shelah and Villaveces by proving that in their context, the uniqueness of limit models follows from categoricity under the assu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

دوره 52  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011